Showing posts with label Knight. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Knight. Show all posts

Sunday, February 19, 2012

Remembering Milton Friedman

The Free to Choose Network is commemorating the 100th birthday of Milton Friedman by releasing an update of his groundbreaking series Free to Choose.  The series titled Testing Milton Friedman will be a three part series of roundtable discussions on three major topics: "The Power of the Market," "Tyranny of Control," and "Created Equal."  The participants include original Free to Choose participant Walter Williams (George Mason University) and other famous economists such as J. Bradford DeLong (University of California - Berkeley), Kevin Murphy (University of Chicago), Bryan Caplan (George Mason University), Austan Goolsbee (University of Chicago), Dani Rodrik (Harvard University), Raghuram Rajan (University of Chicago), and others.




It is scheduled to begin airing May 1, 2012.  Check your local listings for exact date and time.  For those of you who would like to brush up, here is the original Free to Choose series from 1980.






















My Professor, Thomas Rustici, was taught by James Buchanan who was taught by Milton Friedman so I think that makes me Friedman's Great-Grandstudent.  One of the stories that Rustici told me about Buchanan's tenure at the University of Chicago is that Friedman arrived while he was in the middle of his doctorate.  He had already taken his graduate level microeconomics class with Frank Knight, who was chairman of the department.  Knight was apparently so impressed by Friedman's approach to micro that he forced every graduate student to retake their micro course with Friedman.  According to Rustici, Buchanan said that he never really understood Microeconomics until that class.

I recently found a copy of Friedman's Price Theory, which is actually the lecture notes of David Fand and Warren Gustus which were reviewed and enhanced by Friedman.  Friedman characterizes the notes as being part of his course on Price Theory, so I'm not sure if that is the same course that Buchanan told Rustici about (these are the perils of second-hand knowledge) but when I was reading through the book, it was basically what Rustici was teaching on the subject.  In any case, it is a terrific book and even though it is far from famous it is as good or better than anything I've ever read by Friedman or on the subject.

In one of the last conversations I had with my grandfather, Dr. Philip Raup, he mentioned that he once shared a two hour drive with Milton Friedman in the early 1950's.  Friedman was lecturing at Saint John's University in Collegeville, Minnesota.  My Grandfather rode with him from the airport in the Twin Cities to Collegeville.  I asked him what they talked about, or what he could recall of the conversation, and he only said that "He was very opinionated."  I think that is a gentleman's way of saying that they didn't agree very much.

Saturday, October 1, 2011

Austrian School Wins Poll

I asked my readers this question:  "Which 'School' of Economics is Closest to You?"  These were the results:

1.  Austrian (41%)

The Austrian School was founded by a generation of economists that were influenced by Carl Menger, who taught at the University of Vienna.  Notable This generation included Friedrich von Wieser and Eugen von Böhm-Bawerk.  It was Wieser that succeeded Menger at Vienna and taught the next generation which included Friedrich Hayek (left), Ludwig von Mises, and Joseph Schumpeter.  The school is still active with economists such as Peter Boettke and Israel Kirzner.



2.  Neo-Keynesian (24%)

John Maynard Keynes (left) launched this school of thought when he revolutionized the field with his groundbreaking work, The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money.  This work had a lasting influence on other important economists such as Joan Robinson, James Tobin, and perhaps most importantly on Paul Samuelson who did much to add mathematics to the logical principles set forth by Keynes.  This school is probably best described today as New Keynesian and it includes most of the information economists such as George Akerlof and Joseph Stiglitz.  His greatest champion today is likely Paul Krugman.

3.  (other) (17%)

There are many schools that I could not mention such as Neo-Ricardian, Classical, Supply-Side, and others.  Individuals also often refuse to be categorized.

4.  New Institutional (12%)

Institutional economics also dates back to the 1930's when Ronald Coase wrote his essay, "The Theory of the Firm."  This school focuses on  laws that govern behavior and shape social norms as the primary causes of economic realities.  The term New Institutional started in the 1970's when Armen Alchian and Harold Dempsetz completely redrew mainstream economic understanding of the firm in their essay, "Production, Information Costs, and Economic Organization."  Contemporary participants in this school include Elinor Ostrom (left) and Daron Acemoğlu.

5.  Monetarist (6%)

This term is, for the most part, interchangable with the "Chicago" school of economics, which is perhaps the name that it is better known by.  This school was started at the University of Chicago by Frank Knight who invigorated the program there.  Milton Friedman (left) is the economist that is most associated with it.  It possibly has more Nobel laureates than any other school of economic thought; including Friedman, Robert Lucas, Gary Becker, George Stiglitz, Theodore Schultz, James Buchanan, and others.


6.  Marxist (0%)

Karl Marx (left) created the Marxism along with Friedrich Engels in the 19th century.  There have been many individuals including Sydney & Beatrix Webb that were influenced by Marx & Engels.  Marxism has many variations including socialism, communism and combinations with other schools economics to create distinctly Marxist variations.  Much of this has fallen out of favor as most governments that have tried to implement policies that Marx advocated in Kapital have not proven to work very well or at all.



Please vote in the new poll, "Who Should Win the Nobel Prize in Economics?"