Showing posts with label Walter Williams. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Walter Williams. Show all posts

Sunday, February 19, 2012

Remembering Milton Friedman

The Free to Choose Network is commemorating the 100th birthday of Milton Friedman by releasing an update of his groundbreaking series Free to Choose.  The series titled Testing Milton Friedman will be a three part series of roundtable discussions on three major topics: "The Power of the Market," "Tyranny of Control," and "Created Equal."  The participants include original Free to Choose participant Walter Williams (George Mason University) and other famous economists such as J. Bradford DeLong (University of California - Berkeley), Kevin Murphy (University of Chicago), Bryan Caplan (George Mason University), Austan Goolsbee (University of Chicago), Dani Rodrik (Harvard University), Raghuram Rajan (University of Chicago), and others.




It is scheduled to begin airing May 1, 2012.  Check your local listings for exact date and time.  For those of you who would like to brush up, here is the original Free to Choose series from 1980.






















My Professor, Thomas Rustici, was taught by James Buchanan who was taught by Milton Friedman so I think that makes me Friedman's Great-Grandstudent.  One of the stories that Rustici told me about Buchanan's tenure at the University of Chicago is that Friedman arrived while he was in the middle of his doctorate.  He had already taken his graduate level microeconomics class with Frank Knight, who was chairman of the department.  Knight was apparently so impressed by Friedman's approach to micro that he forced every graduate student to retake their micro course with Friedman.  According to Rustici, Buchanan said that he never really understood Microeconomics until that class.

I recently found a copy of Friedman's Price Theory, which is actually the lecture notes of David Fand and Warren Gustus which were reviewed and enhanced by Friedman.  Friedman characterizes the notes as being part of his course on Price Theory, so I'm not sure if that is the same course that Buchanan told Rustici about (these are the perils of second-hand knowledge) but when I was reading through the book, it was basically what Rustici was teaching on the subject.  In any case, it is a terrific book and even though it is far from famous it is as good or better than anything I've ever read by Friedman or on the subject.

In one of the last conversations I had with my grandfather, Dr. Philip Raup, he mentioned that he once shared a two hour drive with Milton Friedman in the early 1950's.  Friedman was lecturing at Saint John's University in Collegeville, Minnesota.  My Grandfather rode with him from the airport in the Twin Cities to Collegeville.  I asked him what they talked about, or what he could recall of the conversation, and he only said that "He was very opinionated."  I think that is a gentleman's way of saying that they didn't agree very much.

Sunday, January 1, 2012

Top Economists of 2011

(Here are the Top Economists of 2012)

Comparing economists is a bit like comparing apples and oranges.  There is so much diversity in the topics that they approach, and different approaches that they take.  Still, it can be quite fun even if ultimately meaningless.

I started entering all the living economists names that I could think of into Google Trends to see who is the most searched for name at Google in 2011.  I think it's an interesting addition to the ways of ranking economists because it shows searches and general awareness.  Here are the results:

Paul Krugman (photo: Cory Doctorow)

rank. name, affiliation (relative percent to top score, ranking last year)

1.   Paul Krugman, Princeton University (100%, 1)
2.   Manmohan Singh, India (85%, 2)
3.   Mario Draghi, European Central Bank (60%, NR)
4.   Ben Bernanke, Federal Reserve Board (46%, 3)
5.   Amartya Sen, Harvard University (34%, 4)
6.   Gloria Arroyo (30%, 16)
7.   Alan Greenspan (26%, 5)
7.   Nouriel Roubini, New York University (26%, 7)
9.   Robert Reich, University of California - Berkeley (24%, NR)
9.   Thomas Sowell, Hoover Institute (24%, 6)

9.   Joseph Stiglitz, Columbia University (24%, 8)
9.   Walter Williams, George Mason University (24%, 9)
13. Mario Monti, Italy (20%, NR)
14. Justin Lin, World Bank (18%, 10)
14. Lawrence Summers, Harvard University (18%, 30)
16. Simon Johnson, M.I.T. (16%, 12)
16. Jeffrey Sachs, Columbia University (16%, 12)
18. Robert Lucas, University of Chicago (14%, 30)
19. Peter Diamond, M.I.T. (12%, 20)
19. David Friedman, Santa Clara University (12%, NR)
19. Mervyn King, Bank of England (12%, 12)
19. Robert Merton, M.I.T. (12%, 16)
23. Brad DeLong, University of California, Berkeley (10%, 12)
23. Robert Shiller, Yale University (10%, 16)
25. Gary Becker, University of Chicago (8%, 20)
25. Tyler Cowen, George Mason University (8%, 20)
25. Steven Levitt, University of Chicago (8%, 26)
25. Greg Mankiw, Harvard University (8%, 16)
29. Elinor Ostrom, Indiana University / Arizona State University (6%, 20)
29. Michael Spence, Hoover Institute (6%, 30)

A number of economists were withdrawn because they were not their top Google search.  The best example of this is John B. Taylor of Stanford University who also shares the same name with a former NFL player and a member of rock group Duran Duran.  Others include, Robert Hall, Robert Lawrence, Peter Phillips, James Hamilton, Kevin Murphy, and James Robinson.

EDIT: As a commenter noticed, Robert Merton is now at M.I.T. and I switched that.  I appreciate everyone adding new economists that I did not think of, this can be considered my selection bias.  I'll leave them in the comments this year, but I will make sure to include them in my calculations next year.  Please keep them coming.

Friday, August 12, 2011

A Fun Way To Rank Economists!

Comparing economists is a bit like comparing apples and oranges.  There is so much diversity in the topics that they approach, and different approaches that they take.  A lot of places like JSTOR rank them by citations, IDEAS ranks them with a compilation of 31 methodologies.  According to their rankings, Andrei Shleifer of Harvard is number one.  I love ranking anything!  I think this goes back to my childhood love of baseball statistics.


There are so many awards that economists can have.  The Nobel Prize is probably the top award in the field, but the John Bates Clark Medal, and being President of the American Economic Association are both highly regarded as well.  Acquiring a great job is the best thing that can happen to any economist, so heading a central bank or any economics department are both extremely prestigious honors as well.

I started entering all the living economists names that I could think of into Google Trends to see who is the most searched for name at Google in 2011.  I think it's an interesting addition to the ways of ranking economists because it shows searches and general awareness.  Here are my results:



As you can see Paul Krugman has a pretty comfortable lead.  He is the trend setter in this exercise with a 1.00 that everyone else's scores are based on.  Why not?  The guy has the bully pulpit of a New York Times column to work with, not to mention all the best-selling books he's written and a Nobel Prize.

Both number two Manmohan Singh and number three Ben Bernanke fill important government positions which land them in the news regularly.  They both still appear on this list because they are both trained economists that later became the Prime Minister and Chairman respectively.


Top Economists in Google Trends:


1.  Paul Krugman, Princeton University (1.00)
2.  Manmohan Singh, India (.58)
3.  Ben Bernanke, Federal Reserve Board (.44)
4.  Amartya Sen, Harvard University (.38)
5.  Alan Greenspan (.28)
6.  Thomas Sowell, Hoover Institute (.26)
7.  Nouriel Roubini, New York University (.22)
8.  Joseph Stiglitz, Columbia University (.20)
9.  Walter Williams, George Mason University (.18)
10.Robert Hall, Stanford University (.12)
10.Justin Lin, World Bank (.12)
12.Brad DeLong, University of California, Berkeley (.10)
12.Simon Johnson, M.I.T. (.10)
12.Mervyn King, Bank of England (.10)
12.Jeffrey Sachs, Columbia University (.10)
16.Gloria Arroyo (.08)
16.Greg Mankiw, Harvard University (.08)
16.Robert Merton, Harvard University (.08)
16.Robert Shiller, Yale University (.08)
20.Gary Becker, University of Chicago (.06)
20.Agustin Carstens, Bank of Mexico (.06)
20.Tyler Cowen, George Mason University (.06)
20.Peter Diamond, M.I.T. (.06)
20.Austan Goolsbee, University of Chicago (.06)
20.Elinor Ostrom, Indiana University / Arizona State University (.06)
26.Esther Duflo, M.I.T. (.04)
26.Steven Levitt, University of Chicago (.04)
26.Gene Sperling, National Economic Council (.04)
26.Jean-Claude Trichet, European Central Bank (.04)
30.Michael Spence, Hoover Institute (.02)
30.Olivier Blanchard, M.I.T. (.02)
30.Mark Carney, Bank of Canada (.02)
30.Robert Lawrence, Harvard University (.02)
30.Robert Lucas, University of Chicago (.02)
30.Kenneth Rogoff, Harvard University (.02)
30.Lawrence Summers, Harvard University (.02)


If you notice a name that I have forgotten, just go to Google Trends and put in Paul Krugman's name first, separate with a comma, and then any additional economists (up to five at a time).  Put their name in quotes ("Paul Krugman") as to search for the term, and not the individual names Paul and Krugman.  I didn't list many economists that received 0's because I am not doing this exercise to embarrass anyone, it's just for fun.  Please post any new results in the comments section.

There were a hand full that I removed for having (what I felt were) abnormally high scores.  John Nash of Princeton received a 1.14.  I realise he is famous from A Beautiful Mind and game theory.  I'm going to skip him for the technicality that he is a mathematician but really it's because I don't understand his score at all.  John B. Taylor of Stanford received a .78, if just listed as John Taylor.  I removed him because he was not his top Google search, but rather third behind a musician and a football player.  Peter Phillips of Yale received a .24 but has the unfortunate position of having a member of the British royal family sharing his name, which skewed his results around the time of the recent royal wedding.  James Hamilton of University of California, San Diego received a .18, but the economist was not the top site listed in his Google search, and the same for Kevin Murphy (.28) of the University of Chicago and James Robinson of Harvard (.14).  Surely these economists receive and deserve recognition as well.

Here are also some other fun comparisons to make:

The "Marginal Revolution" Authors




Capitalism versus Socialism





Keynes versus Hayek